Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Foland

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 4, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was injured by an automobile truck operated by one of the defendants in the course of his employment by the other defendant, and brought an action of negligence. He recovered a verdict for $15,000. The sole claim is that the trial court erred in not setting this verdict aside as excessive. The plaintiff at the time of the injury was twenty-seven years old. There was evidence that the injury consisted of a fracture of the thigh and the crushing and mangling of the ankle and foot of the left leg, necessitating prolonged and very painful treatment, several operations, and three…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seaman v. DexterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Saia v. OnegliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. ClintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. French v. W. W. Mertz Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Atkinson v. MolsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Shaub v. A. H. Phillips, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API