Legal Opinion

French v. W. W. Mertz Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 20, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

This is an appeal from the refusal of the trial court to set aside a verdict rendered in the plaintiff’s favor. The defendants claim that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law, that he assumed the risk of the conditions which brought about his injury and that the verdict is excessive. The jury might reasonably have found the following facts: The defendant The Tracy Brothers Company was engaged in remodeling a store for the defendant The W. W. Mertz Company. In the course of the work a stairway was in process of construction from the ground floor to the floor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kane v. Northern Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Plank v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Brett v. S. H. Frank & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Coogan v. Aeolian Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  5. Gerardi v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Officers Club of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Freedman v. HurwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Ziulkowski v. KolodziejSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Edwards v. KirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  5. Johnson v. PulidySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API