Legal Opinion

Seaman v. Dexter

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 1, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of a servant of the defendant in the operation of his automobile, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the jury before Maltbie, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $12,968, and appeal by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The first ground of appeal is that the court erred in denying the defendant’s motion that the verdict be set aside and a new trial granted because the verdict is against the evidence and the damages awarded are excessive. The remaining reasons of appeal are based upon claimed errors in the charge of the court.

The claimed errors in the charge cannot be considered, in the absence of a finding of the facts which were claimed to have been proved by each side. Practice Book (1908) p. 267, § 6; Nystrom v. Barker, 88 Conn. 382, 385, 91 Atl. 649.

The entire evidence is made a part of the record, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nystrom v. BarkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCormick v. FolandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Hutchinson v. PinneyConnecticut Superior Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API