Legal Opinion

Shaub v. A. H. Phillips, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 13, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

The complaint in this action is in two counts; the first is based on a manager’s security agreement to which the plaintiff became a party, and under which he deposited $200 with the defendant and entered its employ as manager of a store. He claims a return of the deposit on the termination of his employment, alleging that he has complied with the terms of the agreement. The second count. claims damages of $200 on the ground that the defendant fraudulently represented to the plaintiff that it would take accurate inventories of the merchandise in the store managed by him, and instead defrauded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roma v. Thames River Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Basak v. DamutzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Bates v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Levy v. BrombergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. McCormick v. FolandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Alice McNamara Miller v. Anna G. McNamaraConnecticut Superior Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API