Legal Opinion
Raney v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 5, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-0068 (GK/PJA)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ATTRIDGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(e), the parties have consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. Presently under consideration are the defendants’ motions to file an amended answer [40] and for summary judgment [45]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion to file an amended answer and grants in part and denies in part the motion for summary judgment.
I. Background
Three business days before trial, and 15 months after being served with the complaint, the defendants moved to file an amended answer in order to interpose…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sandra G. Bundy v. Delbert Jackson, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Tao v. FreehCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Vivienne Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Company, a Division of Texas-American Petrochemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Executive Sandwich Shoppe, Inc. v. Carr Realty Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lucero-Nelson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Hopkins v. Baltimore Gas And Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Long v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.