Legal Opinion
Lucero-Nelson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 24, 1998No. CIV. A. 92-2401 EGSPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff, Rosemarie Lucero-Nelson, commenced this action for damages and other relief against defendant, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), alleging that WMATA subjected her to sexual harassment, national origin discrimination, and a hostile working environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e)(1988 & Supp. V 1993), and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C.Code 1981, as amended, §§ 1-2501, et seq. Plaintiff also asserts a pendent common…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Walker v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Tapp v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Disability Rights Council v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Thomas v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Plater v. District of Columbia Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.