Legal Opinion
Tao v. Freeh
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 8, 1994No. 92-5502PublishedCited by 305 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment to appellees whom appellant Kuo-Yun Tao alleges required her to go through a lengthy promotion-application process for a second time, while other similarly-situated employees were promoted on the basis of their first applications, in retaliation for her exercise of protected speech.1 The *637district court found that appellees had taken no “adverse action” against appellant sufficient to raise a constitutional claim. Because the requirement that Tao submit new lengthy…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by305 opinions
- Carolyn T. Rodgers v. Elizabeth BanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Douglas v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- James G. Jackson v. City of Columbus, Gregory Lashutka, Thomas W. Rice, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Stewart, Howard P. v. Ashcroft, JohnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
300 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.