Legal Opinion

Stromberg v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1931No. 584PublishedCited by 1,372 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, California, for violation of *361§ 403-a of the Penal Code of that State. That section provides:

“Any person who displays a red flag, banner or badge or any flag, badge, banner, or device of any color or form whatever in any public placé or in any meeting place or public assembly, or from or on any house, building or window as a sign, symbol or emblem of opposition to organized government or as an invitation or stimulus to anarchistic action or as an aid to propaganda that is of a seditious character is guilty of a felony.”

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Fiske v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. People v. MintzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by1,372 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

1,367 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API