Legal Opinion

State v. Canaday

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1978No. 45309, 45338, 45339PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

Defendants in two of these three consolidated cases appeal from superior court order denying their motions to suppress Breathalyzer test results or dismiss the prosecutions on charges of driving while intoxicated. In the third case the State seeks review of a district court order dismissing similar prosecutions.

The three cases all raise the question whether the routine destruction and disposal of Breathalyzer test ampoules violates the due process rights of persons taking the test who are later prosecuted for driving while intoxicated. Defendants here voluntarily took the Breathalyzer test to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. OrthIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API