Legal Opinion

State v. Kelly

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1984No. 49584-0PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

Petitioner, Ivy Gail Kelly, appeals her conviction for second degree murder. The State did not *190object, at trial or on appeal, to expert testimony on the applicability of the "battered woman syndrome" as explanatory of petitioner's actions under a claim of self-defense. The issue before us is whether evidence of petitioner's alleged prior aggressive acts is properly admissible to rebut such expert testimony. We hold it is not. Petitioner also asserts the trial court improperly refused her funds for the transportation of a medical witness. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. SaltarelliWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of BennWashington Supreme Court · 1998

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API