Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Biter
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 18, 2016No. Case No. 1:13-cv-00599-LJO-SKO (PC)PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND OPPOSITION/SURRE-PLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Docs. 87, 88)
Lawrence J. O’Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Felipe Garcia, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 25, 2013. On October 1, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 60.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on October 19, 2015, and Defendants filed their reply on November 2,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Wilhelm v. RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- (HC) Ellis v. Warden of Central California Women's FacilityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Bland v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Brown v. ShafferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Calhoun v. Dela CruzDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Cortinas v. VasquezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.