Legal Opinion

Motorola, Inc. v. J.B. Rodgers Mechanical Contractors, Inc.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 18, 2003No. CV 01-459-PHX-JATPublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TEILBORG, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motorola, Inc. and Royal Indemnity Company’s Motion for Reconsideration Re: October 3, 2002 Discovery Order (Doc. # 84). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the Motion.

Background

At an October 3, 2002 hearing regarding, discovery disputes, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to produce a report prepared by Jack Peterson (Doc. #82). On the last day allowed for producing the report, October 11, 2002, Plaintiffs filed the pending Motion for Reconsideration. At the Court’s request, Defendants filed a Response on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
  3. Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Nutri-Cology, Inc., D/B/A Allergy Research Group Biocurrents, Inc. Stephen A. Levine Susan D. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Moore v. HartmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. BrewerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
  5. Baldwin v. United StatesDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2011

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API