Legal Opinion

United States v. Herbert A. Ellenbogen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 15, 1966No. 30102_1PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Samuel DiChellis and the appellant Herbert A. Ellenbogen were indicted for conspiracy to defraud the United States. 1 In the same indictment, the appellant was charged with two counts of bribery of a federal employee 2 and DiChellis was charged with two counts of receiving the bribes from the appellant. 3 DiChellis pleaded guilty to the three offenses for which he was indicted. Ellenbogen was represented by retained counsel and pleaded not guilty. After a trial before the court without a jury, he was convicted on all three counts. He appealed and we reversed 4 and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Nilva v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Larry KnohlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Herbert A. EllenbogenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API