Legal Opinion

Nilva v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 8, 1957No. 37PublishedCited by 180 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton

In this case, a Federal District Court convicted an attorney of criminal contempt on three specifications for disobeying subpoenas duces tecum, and imposed a general sentence of imprisonment for a year and a day. Since the Government has abandoned two of the specifications, the principal questions are whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction on the third specification standing alone, and, if so, whether the case should be remanded for resentencing. For the reasons hereafter stated, we answer each in the affirmative.

In 1953, in the District Court of the United States for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by180 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Curcio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API