United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. Pederson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from jury convictions for distribution of a controlled substance (cocaine), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Appellant Pederson was also convicted of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844.
Appellant Lustig has raised numerous contentions. In particular, he argues that the judge improperly dismissed a juror, that he should have been granted,a continuance after he obtained new counsel, and that the testimony of his common law…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Larry FlyntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.