Legal Opinion

United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. Pederson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 12, 1977No. 76-2661, 76-2752PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from jury convictions for distribution of a controlled substance (cocaine), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Appellant Pederson was also convicted of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844.

Appellant Lustig has raised numerous contentions. In particular, he argues that the judge improperly dismissed a juror, that he should have been granted,a continuance after he obtained new counsel, and that the testimony of his common law…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Larry FlyntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API