People v. Windham
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, J., *
Contrary to an earlier conclusion reached by this court in People v. Sharp (1972) 7 Cal.3d 448 [103 Cal.Rptr. 233, 499 P.2d 489], the United States Supreme Court has held that a defendant in a state criminal trial has a federal constitutional right to represent himself without counsel if he voluntarily and intelligently elects to do so. (Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 [45 L.Ed.2d 562, 95 S.Ct. 2525].) We are now called upon to determine how the high court’s mandate will be implemented, specifically—prior to what point during pending criminal proceedings must the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- United States v. Raphael PlattnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by286 opinions
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Marshall v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.