Legal Opinion

People v. Windham

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1977No. Crim. 19515PublishedCited by 286 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, J., *

Contrary to an earlier conclusion reached by this court in People v. Sharp (1972) 7 Cal.3d 448 [103 Cal.Rptr. 233, 499 P.2d 489], the United States Supreme Court has held that a defendant in a state criminal trial has a federal constitutional right to represent himself without counsel if he voluntarily and intelligently elects to do so. (Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 [45 L.Ed.2d 562, 95 S.Ct. 2525].) We are now called upon to determine how the high court’s mandate will be implemented, specifically—prior to what point during pending criminal proceedings must the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. United States v. Raphael PlattnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by286 opinions

  1. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Marshall v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API