Legal Opinion

Crocker-Woolworth National Bank v. Carle

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1901No. Sac. No. 741PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

—The plaintiff sued, as assignee, to recover the amount due on a promissory note, of date August 5, 1897, made by Silas Carle, the defendant’s testator, to the “Rae Building and Contracting Co.” for the sum of one thousand dollars, “ said amount to be paid on or before the completion of a certain contract entered into in the month of September, 1896, by and between [the maker] and the board of regents of the University of California,” etc., and assigned to the plaintiff. The complaint, besides the other necessary allegations, alleges the death of the maker on or about September…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Landis v. WoodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Chandler v. CareyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Michigan Chandelier Co. v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. University of Southern California v. BrysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API