Legal Opinion

Manchester v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1937No. 2357PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By CARTER, J.

This cause is in this court on appeal on questions of law. The action is one for wrongful death. The issues having been joined, the cause came on for trial to the court and jury, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff-appellee in the sum of $31,963.00, and judgment rendered thereon by the trial court. The errors urged are as follows:

1. The court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the crane operator, Dzuracki, was a servant of Rust Company at the time of the accident.

2. Defendant’s employes were guilty of no negligence in the premises.

3. The judgment is against the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Moss v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Peters v. United Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Chamberlain v. LeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Valdick v. LeclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haw v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., and to Use of GiacomoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Meyers v. Pittsburgh S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  3. Byrd v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Hudson v. Cleveland (City)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Haney v. Dayton Street Transit Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API