Legal Opinion
Valdick v. Leclair
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1930No. Docket No. 7176PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.
The above-entitled actions are for personal injuries. They were consolidated in the trial court and tried before a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant S. D. LeClair. From the judgment entered upon this verdict the plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.
The undisputed facts are briefly these: On the day of the accident in which plaintiffs and appellants were injured, they were employees of one J. A. Bryant, a contractor, who was at the time erecting a concrete structure in Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, known…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Billing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lowell v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Doty v. LaceyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Strait v. Hale Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Woodall v. Wayne Steffner Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Brumhall v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.