Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

HOSSEINIAN

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1987No. ID 3030PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3030 MATTER OF HOSSEINIAN In Visa Petition Proceedings A-22664984 Decided by Board August 25, 1987 A foreign divorce is not recognized as valid under California law if both parties to the marriage were domiciled in California at the time the divorce proceeding was commenced. Matter of Kurtin,

12 I&N Dec. 284

(BIA 1967), overruled. ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: Rafael A. Rose, Esquire 9107 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 701 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Milhollan, Chairman; Dunno, Morris, Vows., and Heilman, Board Members The United States citizen petitioner applied for immediate rela-…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. BRANTIGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ajmal Jahed v. Neil Acri, Acting Field Office Director for Detention and Removal OperationsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. Miezgiel v. HolderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  3. LOVOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2005
  4. Michael Adjei v. Alejandro MayorkasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  5. Annan v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API