Legal Opinion

BRANTIGAN

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1966No. 1553PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1553 Warta OF BRANTIGAN In Visa Petition Proceedings A-14680158 Decided by Board February 8, 1966 ru vigil petition Proceedings the burden of proof to establish eligibility for the benefit sought rests with the petitioner, and in the absence of proof of the legal termination of a U.S. citizen petitioner's prior marriage, reliance on the presumption of validity accorded by California law to his subsequent ceremonial marriage in that State to beneficiary is not satisfactory evidence of the termination of his prior marriage and is insufficient by itself to sus- tain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re HooDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1945
  2. Greene v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1953

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. LAUREANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
  2. PHILLISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
  3. SORIANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  4. PATELBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  5. COKERBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API