United States v. Mitchell
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Duncan, Judge:
By certificate in the case before us, the acting Judge Advocate General asked the following question:
“WAS THE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW CORRECT IN HOLDING THAT AN OFFICER HAS NO AUTHORITY TO AUTHORIZE AN OFF-POST SEARCH IN OKINAWA?”
The appellant was convicted of wrongful possession of LSD and marihuana, and a violation of a regulation by maintaining a private residence off-post in Okinawa (Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 892 and 934). He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, confinement at hard labor for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. DeLeoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. BurnsideUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. HigginsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. VierraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. BunkleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. ReynoldsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. WhitingU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. SteedU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1975
- United States v. DillardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.