United States v. Reynolds
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
EARLY, Judge:
Tried by general court-martial, the accused was convicted, despite his pleas, of two specifications of larceny, and two specifications of unlawful entry, in violation of Articles 121, and 134, respectively, all Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 934. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to airman basic.
Appellate defense counsel invite our attention to the errors assigned by the accused in his request for appellate representation and assert four…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Albert Douglas Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Robert E. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. DeLeoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. BurnsideUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. RossUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. StoeckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. LovellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. BurdenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. SpannU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. StoeckerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.