Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Cranberry Fuel Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1936No. 8368PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kenna, Judge:

James Ronald Pennington, an infant who sued by his next friend, recovered a judgment in the Circuit Court of Raleigh County against the Cranberry Fuel Company for damages sustained by him from drinking cocoa made from the contents of a can in which there was a dead mouse. To that judgment, the defendant below prosecutes this writ of error.

The only questions for decision arise upon the sufficiency of the plaintiff's proof to sustain the verdict of the jury. The evidence shows that the cocoa was purchased at a store operated by the defendant sometime in December, 1933. A servant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Kroger Grocery Co. v. LewellingMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Sloan v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  5. Schaffner v. National Supply Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Sencer v. Carl's MarketSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  4. Burgess v. Sanitary Meat MarketWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Maynard v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API