Legal Opinion

Sencer v. Carl's Market

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 14, 1950PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

45 So.2d 671 (1950)

SENCER et al.

v.

CARL'S MARKETS, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

April 14, 1950.

Broad & Cassel, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Myers, Heiman & Kaplan and Dixon, DeJarnette & Bradford, Miami, for appellee.

CHAPMAN, Justice.

This appeal is from a final judgment entered below in behalf of defendant-appellee upon sustaining demurrer to plaintiff's-appellant's declaration. The declaration alleged an implied warranty by the defendant-appellee that a can of Bar Harbor Sardines sold by the defendant to the plaintiff was fit for human consumption. It was alleged that the plaintiff,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blanton v. the Cudahy Packing CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Bigelow v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  3. Flessher v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Pelletier v. DupontSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  5. Cliett v. Lauderdale Biltmore CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Foley v. Weaver Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. Edwin Green, Jr., as Administrator of the Estate of Edwin Green, Deceased, and Mary Green v. American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Green v. American Tobacco CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  4. Lamb v. MatetzschkSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. McLeod v. WS Merrell Co., Div. of Richardson-MerrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API