Legal Opinion

Maynard v. General Electric Company

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided October 20, 1972No. Civ. A. 2825PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIE, Chief Judge:

This case is presently before the court on defendant’s motion for .summary judgment, under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion asserts that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Subdivision (e) of the Rule provides that, if the adverse party wishes to assert a contra position, the burden is upon him to come forth with “specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial”, and the courts have held that this subdivision means just what it says. First National…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Halcy R. Maynard and Muriel Maynard v. General Electric Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  2. Williams v. Bill Watson Ford, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
  3. Allen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
  4. United States v. RitterDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API