Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Value City Department Stores v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2002No. 2001-2266PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} The 1997 workers’ compensation claim of appellee-claimant Connie Lunsford was allowed for laceration of her left foot and ankle, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy was later added to her claim. She received temporary total disability compensation (“TTC”).

{¶ 2} In February 1999, a peripheral nerve stimulator was permanently implanted in claimant’s left leg. Relief, however, was intermittent, prompting her attending physician, Dr. Michael Stanton-Hicks, to recommend surgical revision of the leads on her stimulator.

{¶ 3} In the meantime, claimant’s employer, appellant, Value City Department…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Zamora v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Bing v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Copeland Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Conrad v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Value City Dept. Stores v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API