Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Copeland Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1990No. 89-241PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

An award of temporary total disability compensation must be supported by some evidence that: (1) the claimant is not working, (2) the claimant’s allowed conditions prevent a return to the former position of employment, and (3) the claimant’s disability is temporary. State, ex rel. Burley, v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 18, 31 OBR 70, 508 N.E. 2d 936; State, ex rel. Ramirez, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 630, 23 O.O. 3d 518, 433 N.E. 2d 586. Appellant disputes only the commission’s finding that his condition was not permanent. Upon review, however, we find some evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Vulcan Materials Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Eberhardt v. Flxible Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. American Standard, Inc. v. BoehlerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Matlack, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Simon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API