Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bing v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1991No. 90-216PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.

For the reasons which follow, we vacate our earlier opinion in this case, State, ex rel. Bing, v. Indus. Comm. (1990), 55 Ohio St.3d 111, 564 N.E.2d 79, and grant a limited writ returning this matter to the commission for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

In our original opinion in this case, we stated that “ * * * Bing could no longer receive temporary total [disability] compensation for this disability once the commission found that it had become permanent.” Id. at 112, 564 N.E.2d at 80. As both parties and the amici have pointed out, this is not an accurate statement of law.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Bing v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Kaska v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Advantage Tank Lines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Akron Paint & Varnish, Inc. v. GullottaOhio Supreme Court · 2012

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API