Legal Opinion

Kashmir Corp. v. Patterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1980No. 101,896, CA 12100, SC 26649PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*591DENECKE, C. J.

This is an action by the plaintiff builder against the defendant homeowners for moneys allegedly remaining due for the construction of a home. The builder brought his action in two counts, one for moneys remaining due under an express, written contract, and the other for the reasonable value of services rendered in building the home. Upon the owners’ motion, the trial court struck the builder’s reasonable value count. A jury returned a verdict against the builder and for the owners on their counterclaims. The builder appealed to the Court of Appeals contending that the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Turner v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Boswell v. Zephyr Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ken Hood Construction Co. v. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Dortch v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API