Legal Opinion
Dortch v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 15, 1982No. A8009-05162, CA A21613PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*312WARREN, J.
Plaintiff brought this product liability action seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by a Daikon Shield intrauterine birth control device, manufactured and sold by defendant. Defendant moved for judgment on the pleadings under ORCP 2 IB, on the ground that ORS 30.905, the applicable statute of limitations, barred the claim. The trial court allowed the motion and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
The facts before us are those alleged in the complaint. On or about May 1, 1971, a Daikon Shield was inserted in plaintiff for the purpose of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Mastro v. BrodieSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Condon v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Allen v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.