Legal Opinion
Iskian v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 12, 1952No. 35277PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
By this action, Bonnie W. Iskian, as plaintiff, seeks to recover 1/8 of the royalties payable for production of oil and gas from certain lands in Grant county, Oklahoma, in which the defendants contend she owns only 1/16 royalty interest. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The defendants Rufus Forsyth and Alice M. Forsyth, his wife, were the owners in fee of a quarter section (160 acres) of land in said county when, in 1924, they executed an oil and gas lease thereon, containing the following provision, which is commonly referred to as an “entirety” clause, to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. SchonwaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Continental Supply Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dawson v. MeikeWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
- Colonial Royalties Co. v. KeenerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Foertsch v. SchausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Krone v. LacyNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Fransen v. EckhardtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.