Legal Opinion
Continental Supply Co. v. Levy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 11, 1926No. 16535PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
The parties will be referred toi herein as they appeared in the trial court.
The defendants were the jcint owners of an oil lease and all equipment thereon. On May 7, 1920, one Thomas Green, purporting to act for the defendants, entered into a written contract to sell said property to the plaintiff, Levy. The contract specifically set c-ut the property which was to be sold. After specifying the amount of material on the lease, “including two oilfield boilers,” it provided : „
“All oil in tanks now upon said leased premises, being approximately about 500 barrels and approximately 800 barrels of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Kee v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Lindsay Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & FraterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Brake v. BlainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Balderacchi v. RuthCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Rist v. Westhoma Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Walker v. BuildDirect.com Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Sullivan v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.