Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Meike

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1973No. 4155, 4156PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Parker

Plaintiffs brought an action against defendants, seeking a share of mineral lease rentals on approximately 7,660 acres of land previously deeded to defendants with certain reservations. The land, formerly belonging to Jennette and Earl A. Dawson, was in 1950 transferred by agreement and warranty deed to defendants. 1 After both plaintiffs and defendants had completed their pleadings and had moved for summary judgment, the matter was set for hearing, whereupon the plaintiffs’ motion was denied but defendant-Harold Meike’s was granted 2 the court finding, inter alia:

“* * * plaintiffs’ complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. MorganMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Magnusson v. Colorado Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Cinderella Theatre Co. v. United Detroit Theatres Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Houghton v. ThompsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Barlow v. MakeeffWyoming Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. Pennzoil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Knadler v. AdamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gregory v. SandersWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Bowers Welding and Hotshot, Inc. v. BromleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API