Legal Opinion
Rowe v. ROWE
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is a suit for a declaratory decree in which plaintiff prays for the construction of the provisions of two similar testamentary trusts under each of which he was named as one of the life beneficiaries. The de fendant, Wilbur G. Rowe, was named as trustee. The other defendants are the remaindermen named in the trust. The defendants appeal from a decree construing the trust favorably to the plaintiff.
The trusts were created in the separate wills of Enoch J. Peterson and Nellie R. Peterson, husband and wife. Each of the wills contained the following provision (combined in the excerpt below…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Luis v. MuhrbackOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re Lidston's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Holohan v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re Holland's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Hodgkin v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jarrett v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Baldus v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- White v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Masters v. BissettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.