Legal Opinion

Hodgkin v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, C. J.

There is but one question in this case, and that is the construction to be placed upon the language used by the testatrix in making her will.

It is a well-known rule of law in this state, so thoroughly established as to require no citation of authorities, that where real property is specifically devised and such property is subject to a mortgage made by the testator, such mortgage is to be satisfied and discharged out of any property not specifically devised, if such property is sufficient for the purpose *386and no different intent appeals in the will. So the question here is: Does the clause in…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Oregon Humane SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Rowe v. ROWEOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Currie v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Estate of MatthiessenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Estate of Short v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API