Legal Opinion

Piper v. Fickett

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1973No. 6599PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The only issue in this case is whether testimony about statements made by a deceased person as to the amount of insurance placed on a ring should have been excluded as hearsay.

The issue arose out of an action to recover the value of a ring which had been taken in 1968 to the defendant to be resized. Defendant sent the ring to a firm in Worcester, Massachusetts to have the work done. After it was returned to the defendant, it disappeared. The case was tried without a jury, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1150.00. The defendant’s exception to the admission of evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Claremont Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  2. Perry v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
  3. Sullivan v. DumaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  4. Lebrun v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  5. Gagnon v. PronovostSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Delta Education, Inc. v. LangloisDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1989
  3. Nute v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. State v. MartineauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Town of Weare v. Estate of PaquetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API