Piper v. Fickett
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The only issue in this case is whether testimony about statements made by a deceased person as to the amount of insurance placed on a ring should have been excluded as hearsay.
The issue arose out of an action to recover the value of a ring which had been taken in 1968 to the defendant to be resized. Defendant sent the ring to a firm in Worcester, Massachusetts to have the work done. After it was returned to the defendant, it disappeared. The case was tried without a jury, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1150.00. The defendant’s exception to the admission of evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roberts v. Claremont Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
- Perry v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
- Sullivan v. DumaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- Lebrun v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Gagnon v. PronovostSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Delta Education, Inc. v. LangloisDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1989
- Nute v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. MartineauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Town of Weare v. Estate of PaquetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.