Perry v. Parker
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
Maps, surveys, plans and plots which are thirty years old, free on their face of suspicion and found in proper custody are admissible in evidence as ancient documents as an exception to the hearsay rule. Lawrence v. Tennant, 64 N. H. 532; Twombly v. Lord, 74 N. H. 211. The plan in this case, although over twenty-five years old, does not satisfy this test of antiquity and is not classified as an ancient document. 46 A. L. R. (2d) 1318. There was a suggestion in a dictum in Homer v. Cilley, 14 N. H. 85, 98, that the period might be reduced to twenty years but it died aborning. However, we think…
2Cited by11 opinions
- In re Estate of KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. LarochelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Reeves v. CoxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Seely v. HandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.