Legal Opinion

Gagnon v. Pronovost

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 2, 1952No. 4132PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The first issue before us is whether the question of the respective interests of the parties is res judicata as the defendants claim. This matter originally came to us as the result of a dispute over the construction of a deed. The grantees in the deed were Georgiana Turgeon and Jules Letourneau. The plaintiff claims under Georgiana and the defendants under Jules. Our opinion held that the case “presents the question whether a joint tenancy or a tenancy in common was created by the deed.” Gagnon v. Pronovost, 96 N. H. 154, 155, 156. This was the sole issue then before us and we decided that…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. American United Life Insurance Company v. PeffleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Randall E. Sebold, Sr. v. Irene H. SeboldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Piper v. FickettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Taylor v. HowettCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
  5. Wallace v. Lakes Region Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API