Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Dumaine

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1964No. 5248PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

There was some evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim that she was promised the property at 4 Hamilton Street in Nashua by the decedent Michael Sullivan. See White v. Poole, 74 N. H. 71. However we cannot say that the defendants’ contention and the determination of the Trial Court “that there is a lack of clear and convincing evidence” that the promise was made is erroneous on the record before us. A leading commentator in this field (Sparks, Contracts to Make Wills 22-23, 24 (1956)) summarizes the problem as follows: “Much of the litigation concerning contracts to make wills has been…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Humiston v. BushnellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Nute v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Woll v. DugasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Piper v. FickettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. Ross v. EichmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API