Legal Opinion

Lebrun v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 1, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

1. “Each party in a civil cause is entitled to three peremptory challenges of jurors drawn for the trial. The peremptory challenges shall be exercised alternately, beginning with the plaintiff.” P. L., c. 339, s. 19.

On impaneling the jury both the plaintiff and the defendant exercised their first challenges. The plaintiff waived his second challenge and the defendant did likewise. When the plaintiff attempted to exercise his third challenge, objection being made, the court ruled that he was not entitled to a third challenge, to which ruling he excepted. The plaintiff’s position in argument…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nicholls v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Riley v. BoehmMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Wilcox v. DowningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  4. Town of Bridgewater v. Town of RoxburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  5. Inhabitants of Augusta v. Inhabitants of WindsorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fagan v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Gregory v. PadillaAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Brown v. Marker Ex Rel. MarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. State v. LizotteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  5. Grossman v. Delaware Electric Power Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API