Legal Opinion

Morman v. Ryskamp

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1926No. Docket No. 72PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

Plaintiffs are dealers in building materials in the city of Grand Eapids. They furnished to one Joseph Hartstra, a contractor, certain materials which went into the construction of a market for the defendants, Eyskamp and others. Eyskamp required a bond from Hartstra, conditioned for the faithful performance of the building contract, and for the payment of all labor and material claims. Defendant Joseph Noorthoek became surety on this bond. The contractor, Hartstra, failed to pay plaintiffs for the materials furnished him, and plaintiff, on the 19th of April, 1923, filed a claim of lien for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. GibbonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Grace Harbor Lumber Co. v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Ypsilanti Lumber & Coal Co. v. LeslieMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Spicer v. DugreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Corlett-Stone Lumber Co. v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tempo, Inc v. Rapid Electric Sales & Service, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. McLean v. LisowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Vorrath v. GarreltsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Vorrath v. GarreltsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API