Legal Opinion

Grace Harbor Lumber Co. v. Ortman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. Docket No. 129PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Murphy, J. Bill by Grace Harbor Lumber Company, a corporation, against Ferdinand C. Ortman and others to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this case is filed for the purpose of enforcing a mechanic’s lien. Prior to the filing of the bill, the owner, Louis Smilansky, had released the liens of the complainant and the cross-complainants, the Bartlett Supply Company and Ferdinand C. Ortman, by filing a bond with the county clerk upon which bond William Friedman, Henry M. Weil, and Max Smilansky became sureties. Upon filing the bill the complainant made the three individuals who had signed the surety bond parties defendant, which course was followed by the cross-complainants. The principal defendant, Louis Smilansky, in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morton v. . TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Durkee v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Toms v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  5. Wilder v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ball v. SweeneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. General Insurance Company of America, a Washington Corpoation v. Lamar Corporation, a Michigan Corporation, Also Known as Lamar Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Rix v. O'NEILMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Dudley v. RapanosMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Mousseau v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API