Legal Opinion

Spicer v. Dugrey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1922No. Docket No. 76PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from. Wayne; Richter (Theodore J.), J. Bill by Edwin Spicer, doing business as David Spicer’s Sons, against Arthur Dugrey and others to foreclose1 a mechanic’s lien. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Defendants, Arthur Dugrey and wife, were the owners of a vacant lot in the city of Detroit. In July, 1919, they entered into a written contract with defendant Ferguson Construction Company to construct a house and garage thereon for the consideration of $9,250. A week or so thereafter the Ferguson Construction Company made an agreement with plaintiff to construct the building and garage on the basis of cost, plus 10 per cent. Plaintiff went forward with the work until he had it “roughed in.” Up to this point it had cost him $5,229.90. He was unable to carry the work farther by reason of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. CasserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Halpin v. GarmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Canvasser Custom Builders, Inc. v. SeskinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Vorrath v. GarreltsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Morman v. RyskampMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Vorrath v. GarreltsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Vorrath v. GarreltsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API