Legal Opinion
Kandel v. Brother International Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 1, 2010No. CV 08-1040-DSF(RCx), CV 08-6126-DSF(RCx)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN ORDER DECLARING 28 DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY DEFENDANTS ARE NOT PRIVILEGED
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On November 24, 2009, plaintiffs, without filing a notice of motion and motion, filed a joint stipulation, the supporting declaration of Mitch Kalcheim with numerous exhibits and the opposing declarations of Charles Stadler and Layne Melzer with exhibits, and on December 2, 2009, plaintiffs filed a supplemental memorandum and the reply declaration of Mitch Kalcheim with exhibits and defendants filed their…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Moe v. System Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2010
- Friends of Hope Valley v. Frederick Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- McAdam v. State National InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Chaudhry v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Edgar Hernandez, et al. v. Progressive Direct Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.