Moe v. System Transport, Inc.
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JEREMIAH C. LYNCH, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Carrie Moe’s First Motion to Compel Discovery. The Court construes the motion as filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted and denied, in part, as specified herein.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 15, 2003, Plaintiff Carrie Moe (“Moe”) was injured in a vehicular collision which occurred between an automobile she was operating and a semi-truck trailer unit operated by Kenneth Gert, an employee of Defendant System Transport, Inc. (“System Transport”). System Transport…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rogers v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Frost v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2016
- Anastasi v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
- Anastasi v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
- Anderson v. Boyne USA, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.