Legal Opinion
McAdam v. State National Insurance
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 21, 2014No. Case No. 12-CV-1333 BTM-MDDPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO THE ORDER COMPELLING BETTER DISCOVERY RESPONSES
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge.
Defendant State National Insurance Company, Inc. (“State National”) and Arnold & Arnold, Inc. (collectively, “the objectors”) have filed objections (Doc. 50) to the November 1, 2013 Order Compelling Better Discovery Responses in this case. .For the reasons set forth herein, the Court VACATES the Order (Doc. 44) and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order.
I. BACKGROUND
This case arises from a “Hull and Machinery/Protection and Indemnity” Policy (“Policy”)…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Williams v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Sean HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Black v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Camarillo v. Balboa Thrift and Loan AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Chad Scott Lawrence v. Ryan Thornell, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Cleveland v. The BehemothDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.