Kramer v. Sanguinetti
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
A rehearing of this case was granted for the sole reason that the trial court failed to render judgment quieting title in the defendants to their separate placer mine to which the plaintiff claims no title. Defendants’ title to his claim was an issue in the case and should have been determined. Assuming that such a modification of the judgment should be made by the trial court, we have concluded that the cause should be remanded for that purpose. Otherwise, the opinion previously rendered properly determines the issues, and it is therefore adopted as follows:
“The defendants have appealed from…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Donahue v. MeisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
- Nevada Sierra Oil Co. v. Home Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Saracco Tank & Welding Co. v. PlatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Newman v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Veale v. PiercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. Birch Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Ehrhart v. BowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.