People v. Birch Securities Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The State of California brought suit against the defendant, a foreign corporation, for franchise taxes due and payable for the years 1935 and 1936, pursuant to the provisions of the Bank and Corporation Franchise Tax Act. (Stats. 1929, p. 19, and amends.; 3 Deering’s Gen. Laws, p. 3010, Act 8488.) The amended complaint was couched in two counts. The trial court adopted findings favorable to plaintiff, and rendered judgment accordingly upon each cause of action. From that judgment the defendant has appealed.
The appellant contends that the amended complaint fails to state facts sufficient to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Searcy v. Hemet Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- United Farm Workers of America v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Merrill Eugene Riggle v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.