State v. Wiltse
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Owen Wiltse appeals his conviction for violating a protection order, contending that he should have been allowed to present evidence concerning his presence at the home in question and of his intent in going there. Appellant claims pretrial suppression of this evidence effectively denied him a fair trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
In February, 1985, a protection order was issued, restraining Owen Wiltse from entering the residence of Tracy Smith. The protection order also required Smith to immediately turn over all of appellant’s belongings still in her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BrechonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- United States v. Thomas Richard BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- State v. BlankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. NobleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State of Minnesota v. Scott Randall BaynesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015