Legal Opinion

State v. Wiltse

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1986No. C4-85-1400PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Owen Wiltse appeals his conviction for violating a protection order, contending that he should have been allowed to present evidence concerning his presence at the home in question and of his intent in going there. Appellant claims pretrial suppression of this evidence effectively denied him a fair trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

In February, 1985, a protection order was issued, restraining Owen Wiltse from entering the residence of Tracy Smith. The protection order also required Smith to immediately turn over all of appellant’s belongings still in her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BrechonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. United States v. Thomas Richard BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. State v. BlankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. NobleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State of Minnesota v. Scott Randall BaynesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API